United States Integration Platform as a Service 麻豆原创 Insights, Forecast to 2029

Publication ID:

PB502232303

Publication Date:

February 24, 2023

Pages:

Publisher:

MRRPB5

Countries:

USA [1]

USD 3,400.00

IT Services [2]

Hardware (Computing & Electronics) [3]

Computing & Electronics [4]

Description:

United States Integration Platform as a Service 麻豆原创 Insights, Forecast to 2029
The key companies of Integration Platform as a Service in United States include IBM, Microsoft, Oracle, SAP, MuleSoft, Boomi, Jitterbit, SnapLogic, and Talend, etc. In 2022, the top five players in United States had a share approximately xx % in terms of revenue.

Report Includes
This report presents an overview of United States market for Integration Platform as a Service market size. Analyses of the United States market trends, with historic market revenue data for 2018 - 2022, estimates for 2023, and projections of CAGR through 2029.
This report focuses on the Integration Platform as a Servicerevenue, market share and industry ranking of main companies, data from 2018 to 2023. Identification of the major stakeholders in the United States Integration Platform as a Service market, and analysis of their competitive landscape and market positioning based on recent developments and segmental revenues. This report will help stakeholders to understand the competitive landscape and gain more insights and position their businesses and market strategies in a better way.
This report analyzes the segments data by Type and by Application, revenue, and growth rate, from 2018 to 2029. Evaluation and forecast the market size for Integration Platform as a Service revenue, projected growth trends, production technology, application and end-user industry.

Segment by Type:
Data Integration
Application Integration
IoT Integration
API Integration
B2B Integration
Cloud Integration

Segment By Application
Healthcare
Retail
Manufacturing
BFSI
Education
Government
Transportation
Others

Key companies covered in this report:
IBM
Microsoft
Oracle
SAP
MuleSoft
Boomi
Jitterbit
SnapLogic
Talend
Informatica
TIBCO
Workato

Please Note - This is an on demand report and will be delivered in 2 business days (48 hours) post payment.

Table Of Contents:

1 Report Overview 1
1.1 Study Scope 1
1.2 麻豆原创 Analysis by Type 1
1.2.1 United States Integration Platform as a Service 麻豆原创 Size Growth Rate by Type: 2018 VS 2022 VS 2029 1
1.2.2 Data Integration 3
1.2.3 Application Integration 3
1.2.4 IoT Integration 4
1.2.5 API Integration 4
1.2.6 B2B Integration 4
1.2.7 Cloud Integration 5
1.3 麻豆原创 by Application 5
1.3.1 United States Integration Platform as a Service 麻豆原创 Share by Application: 2018 VS 2022 VS 2029 6
1.3.2 Healthcare 8
1.3.3 Retail 8
1.3.4 Manufacturing 8
1.3.5 BFSI 9
1.3.6 Education 9
1.3.7 Government 9
1.3.8 Transportation 9
1.4 Assumptions and Limitations 9
1.5 Study Objectives 10
1.6 Years Considered 11
2 United States Growth Trends 12
2.1 United States Integration Platform as a Service 麻豆原创 Perspective (2018-2029) 12
2.2 Integration Platform as a Service 麻豆原创 Dynamics 13
2.2.1 Integration Platform as a Service Industry Trends 13
2.2.2 Integration Platform as a Service 麻豆原创 Drivers 14
2.2.3 Integration Platform as a Service 麻豆原创 Challenges 14
2.2.4 Integration Platform as a Service 麻豆原创 Restraints 15
3 Competition Landscape by Key Players 16
3.1 Global Revenue Integration Platform as a Service by Players 16
3.1.1 United States Integration Platform as a Service Revenue by Players (2018-2023) 16
3.1.2 United States Integration Platform as a Service Revenue 麻豆原创 Share by Players (2018-2023) 18
3.2 United States Integration Platform as a Service 麻豆原创 Share by Company Type (Tier 1, Tier 2, and Tier 3) 21
3.3 United States of Integration Platform as a Service, Ranking by Revenue, 2021 VS 2022 VS 2023 23
3.4 United States Integration Platform as a Service 麻豆原创 Concentration Ratio 24
3.4.1 United States Integration Platform as a Service 麻豆原创 Concentration Ratio (CR5 and HHI) 24
3.4.2 United States Top 10 and Top 5 Companies by Integration Platform as a Service Revenue in 2022 25
3.5 United States of Integration Platform as a Service Head office and Area Served 25
3.6 United States of Integration Platform as a Service, Product and Application 27
3.7 United States of Integration Platform as a Service, Date of Enter into This Industry 30
3.8 Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion Plans 32
4 Integration Platform as a Service Breakdown Data by Type 33
4.1 United States Integration Platform as a Service Historic 麻豆原创 Size by Type (2018-2023) 33
4.2 United States Integration Platform as a Service Forecasted 麻豆原创 Size by Type (2024-2029) 34
5 Integration Platform as a Service Breakdown Data By Application 36
5.1 United States Integration Platform as a Service Historic 麻豆原创 Size By Application (2018-2023) 36
5.2 United States Integration Platform as a Service Forecasted 麻豆原创 Size By Application (2024-2029) 37
6 Key Players Profiles 39
6.1 IBM 39
6.1.1 IBM Company Details 39
6.1.2 IBM Business Overview 39
6.1.3 IBM Integration Platform as a Service Introduction 40
6.1.4 IBM in United States: Revenue in Integration Platform as a Service Business (2018-2023) 40
6.1.5 IBM Recent Development 40
6.2 Microsoft 41
6.2.1 Microsoft Company Details 41
6.2.2 Microsoft Business Overview 41
6.2.3 Microsoft Integration Platform as a Service Introduction 42
6.2.4 Microsoft in United States: Revenue in Integration Platform as a Service Business (2018-2023) 42
6.2.5 Microsoft Recent Development 42
6.3 Oracle 43
6.3.1 Oracle Company Details 43
6.3.2 Oracle Business Overview 43
6.3.3 Oracle Integration Platform as a Service Introduction 44
6.3.4 Oracle in United States: Revenue in Integration Platform as a Service Business (2018-2023) 44
6.3.5 Oracle Recent Development 44
6.4 SAP 45
6.4.1 SAP Company Details 45
6.4.2 SAP Business Overview 45
6.4.3 SAP Integration Platform as a Service Introduction 46
6.4.4 SAP in United States: Revenue in Integration Platform as a Service Business (2018-2023) 46
6.4.5 SAP Recent Development 46
6.5 MuleSoft 47
6.5.1 MuleSoft Company Details 47
6.5.2 MuleSoft Business Overview 47
6.5.3 MuleSoft Integration Platform as a Service Introduction 48
6.5.4 MuleSoft in United States: Revenue in Integration Platform as a Service Business (2018-2023) 48
6.5.5 MuleSoft Recent Development 48
6.6 Boomi 49
6.6.1 Boomi Company Details 49
6.6.2 Boomi Business Overview 49
6.6.3 Boomi Integration Platform as a Service Introduction 50
6.6.4 Boomi in United States: Revenue in Integration Platform as a Service Business (2018-2023) 50
6.6.5 Boomi Recent Development 50
6.7 Jitterbit 51
6.7.1 Jitterbit Company Details 51
6.7.2 Jitterbit Business Overview 51
6.7.3 Jitterbit Integration Platform as a Service Introduction 52
6.7.4 Jitterbit in United States: Revenue in Integration Platform as a Service Business (2018-2023) 52
6.7.5 Jitterbit Recent Development 52
6.8 SnapLogic 53
6.8.1 SnapLogic Company Details 53
6.8.2 SnapLogic Business Overview 53
6.8.3 SnapLogic Integration Platform as a Service Introduction 54
6.8.4 SnapLogic in United States: Revenue in Integration Platform as a Service Business (2018-2023) 54
6.8.5 SnapLogic Recent Development 54
6.9 Talend 55
6.9.1 Talend Company Details 55
6.9.2 Talend Business Overview 55
6.9.3 Talend Integration Platform as a Service Introduction 56
6.9.4 Talend in United States: Revenue in Integration Platform as a Service Business (2018-2023) 56
6.9.5 Talend Recent Development 56
6.10 Informatica 57
6.10.1 Informatica Company Details 57
6.10.2 Informatica Business Overview 57
6.10.3 Informatica Integration Platform as a Service Introduction 58
6.10.4 Informatica in United States: Revenue in Integration Platform as a Service Business (2018-2023) 58
6.10.5 Informatica Recent Development 58
6.11 TIBCO 59
6.11.1 TIBCO Company Details 59
6.11.2 TIBCO Business Overview 59
6.11.3 TIBCO Integration Platform as a Service Introduction 60
6.11.4 TIBCO in United States: Revenue in Integration Platform as a Service Business (2018-2023) 60
6.11.5 TIBCO Recent Development 60
6.12 Workato 61
6.12.1 Workato Company Details 61
6.12.2 Workato Business Overview 61
6.12.3 Workato Integration Platform as a Service Introduction 62
6.12.4 Workato in United States: Revenue in Integration Platform as a Service Business (2018-2023) 62
6.12.5 Workato Recent Development 62
7 Analyst's Viewpoints/Conclusions 64
8 Appendix 65
8.1 Research Methodology 65
8.1.1 Methodology/Research Approach 65
8.1.2 Data Source 68
8.2 Author Details 71
8.3 Disclaimer 73

Companies Mentioned:

IBM
Microsoft
Oracle
SAP
MuleSoft
Boomi
Jitterbit
SnapLogic
Talend
Informatica
TIBCO
Workato

License Types:

Single User License (PDF)

This license allows for use of a publication by one person.
This person may print out a single copy of the publication.
This person can include information given in the publication in presentations and internal reports by providing full copyright credit to the publisher.
This person cannot share the publication (or any information contained therein) with any other person or persons.
Unless a Enterprise License is purchased, a Single User License must be purchased for every person that wishes to use the publication within the same organization.
Customers who infringe these license terms are liable for a Global license fee.

听

Site License (PDF)*

This license allows for use of a publication by all users within one corporate location, e.g. a regional office.
These users may print out a single copy of the publication.
These users can include information given in the publication in presentations and internal reports by providing full copyright credit to the publisher.
These users cannot share the publication (or any information contained therein) with any other person or persons outside the corporate location for which the publication is purchased.
Unless a Enterprise License is purchased, a Site User License must be purchased for every corporate location by an organization that wishes to use the publication within the same organization.
Customers who infringe these license terms are liable for a Global license fee.

听

Global License (PDF)*

This license allows for use of a publication by unlimited users within the purchasing organization e.g. all employees of a single company.
Each of these people may use the publication on any computer, and may print out the report, but may not share the publication (or any information contained therein) with any other person or persons outside of the organization.
These employees of purchasing organization can include information given in the publication in presentations and internal reports by providing full copyright credit to the publisher.

*If Applicable.