Transaction monitoring听refers to the听monitoring听of customer听transactions, including assessing historical/current customer information and interactions to provide a complete picture of customer activity. This can include transfers, deposits, and withdrawals.
麻豆原创 Analysis and Insights: Global Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创
The global Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services market is projected to grow from US$ million in 2023 to US$ million by 2029, at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of % during the forecast period.
The US & Canada market for Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services is estimated to increase from $ million in 2023 to reach $ million by 2029, at a CAGR of % during the forecast period of 2023 through 2029.
The China market for Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services is estimated to increase from $ million in 2023 to reach $ million by 2029, at a CAGR of % during the forecast period of 2023 through 2029.
The Europe market for Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services is estimated to increase from $ million in 2023 to reach $ million by 2029, at a CAGR of % during the forecast period of 2023 through 2029.
The global key companies of Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services include NICE, Oracle, FICO, BAE Systems, Fiserv, SAS, Experian, FIS and ACI Worldwide, etc. in 2022, the global top five players had a share approximately % in terms of revenue.
Report Includes
This report presents an overview of global market for Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services market size. Analyses of the global market trends, with historic market revenue data for 2018 - 2022, estimates for 2023, and projections of CAGR through 2029.
This report researches the key producers of Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services, also provides the revenue of main regions and countries. Highlights of the upcoming market potential for Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services, and key regions/countries of focus to forecast this market into various segments and sub-segments. Country specific data and market value analysis for the U.S., Canada, Mexico, Brazil, China, Japan, South Korea, Southeast Asia, India, Germany, the U.K., Italy, Middle East, Africa, and Other Countries.
This report focuses on the Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services revenue, market share and industry ranking of main companies, data from 2018 to 2023. Identification of the major stakeholders in the global Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services market, and analysis of their competitive landscape and market positioning based on recent developments and segmental revenues. This report will help stakeholders to understand the competitive landscape and gain more insights and position their businesses and market strategies in a better way.
This report analyzes the segments data by type and by application, revenue, and growth rate, from 2018 to 2029. Evaluation and forecast the market size for Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services revenue, projected growth trends, production technology, application and end-user industry.
Descriptive company profiles of the major global players, including NICE, Oracle, FICO, BAE Systems, Fiserv, SAS, Experian, FIS and ACI Worldwide, etc.
By Company
NICE
Oracle
FICO
BAE Systems
Fiserv
SAS
Experian
FIS
ACI Worldwide
Refinitiv
Software
ComplyAdvantage
Infrasoft Technologies
ACTICO
EastNets
Bottomline
Beam Solutions
IdentityMind
CaseWare
Segment by Type
Cloud-based Platform
Web-based Platform
Segment by Application
AML
FDP
Compliance Management
Customer Identity Management
By Region
North America
United States
Canada
Europe
Germany
France
UK
Italy
Russia
Nordic Countries
Rest of Europe
Asia-Pacific
China
Japan
South Korea
Southeast Asia
India
Australia
Rest of Asia
Latin America
Mexico
Brazil
Rest of Latin America
Middle East, Africa, and Latin America
Turkey
Saudi Arabia
UAE
Rest of MEA
Chapter Outline
Chapter 1: Introduces the report scope of the report, executive summary of different market segments (product type, application, etc.), including the market size of each market segment, future development potential, and so on. It offers a high-level view of the current state of the market and its likely evolution in the short to mid-term, and long term.
Chapter 2: Revenue of Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services in global and regional level. It provides a quantitative analysis of the market size and development potential of each region and its main countries and introduces the market development, future development prospects, market space, and capacity of each country in the world. This section also introduces the market dynamics, latest developments of the market, the driving factors and restrictive factors of the market, the challenges and risks faced by companies in the industry, and the analysis of relevant policies in the industry.
Chapter 3: Detailed analysis of Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services companies鈥� competitive landscape, revenue, market share and industry ranking, latest development plan, merger, and acquisition information, etc.
Chapter 4: Provides the analysis of various market segments by type, covering the revenue, and development potential of each market segment, to help readers find the blue ocean market in different market segments.
Chapter 5: Provides the analysis of various market segments by application, covering the revenue, and development potential of each market segment, to help readers find the blue ocean market in different downstream markets.
Chapter 6: North America by type, by application and by country, revenue for each segment.
Chapter 7: Europe by type, by application and by country, revenue for each segment.
Chapter 8: China by type and by application revenue for each segment.
Chapter 9: Asia (excluding China) by type, by application and by region, revenue for each segment.
Chapter 10: Middle East, Africa, and Latin America by type, by application and by country, revenue for each segment.
Chapter 11: Provides profiles of key companies, introducing the basic situation of the main companies in the market in detail, including product descriptions and specifications, Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services revenue, gross margin, and recent development, etc.
Chapter 12: Analyst's Viewpoints/Conclusions
Please Note - This is an on demand report and will be delivered in 2 business days (48 hours) post payment.
1 Report Overview
1.1 Study Scope
1.2 麻豆原创 Analysis by Type
1.2.1 Global Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size Growth Rate by Type, 2018 VS 2022 VS 2029
1.2.2 Cloud-based Platform
1.2.3 Web-based Platform
1.3 麻豆原创 by Application
1.3.1 Global Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size Growth Rate by Application, 2018 VS 2022 VS 2029
1.3.2 AML
1.3.3 FDP
1.3.4 Compliance Management
1.3.5 Customer Identity Management
1.4 Assumptions and Limitations
1.5 Study Objectives
1.6 Years Considered
2 Global Growth Trends
2.1 Global Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Perspective (2018-2029)
2.2 Global Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services Growth Trends by Region
2.2.1 Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size by Region: 2018 VS 2022 VS 2029
2.2.2 Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services Historic 麻豆原创 Size by Region (2018-2023)
2.2.3 Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services Forecasted 麻豆原创 Size by Region (2024-2029)
2.3 Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Dynamics
2.3.1 Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services Industry Trends
2.3.2 Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Drivers
2.3.3 Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Challenges
2.3.4 Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Restraints
3 Competition Landscape by Key Players
3.1 Global Revenue Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services by Players
3.1.1 Global Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services Revenue by Players (2018-2023)
3.1.2 Global Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services Revenue 麻豆原创 Share by Players (2018-2023)
3.2 Global Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Share by Company Type (Tier 1, Tier 2, and Tier 3)
3.3 Global Key Players of Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services, Ranking by Revenue, 2021 VS 2022 VS 2023
3.4 Global Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Concentration Ratio
3.4.1 Global Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Concentration Ratio (CR5 and HHI)
3.4.2 Global Top 10 and Top 5 Companies by Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services Revenue in 2022
3.5 Global Key Players of Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services Head office and Area Served
3.6 Global Key Players of Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services, Product and Application
3.7 Global Key Players of Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services, Date of Enter into This Industry
3.8 Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion Plans
4 Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services Breakdown Data by Type
4.1 Global Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services Historic 麻豆原创 Size by Type (2018-2023)
4.2 Global Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services Forecasted 麻豆原创 Size by Type (2024-2029)
5 Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services Breakdown Data by Application
5.1 Global Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services Historic 麻豆原创 Size by Application (2018-2023)
5.2 Global Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services Forecasted 麻豆原创 Size by Application (2024-2029)
6 North America
6.1 North America Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size (2018-2029)
6.2 North America Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size by Type
6.2.1 North America Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size by Type (2018-2023)
6.2.2 North America Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size by Type (2024-2029)
6.2.3 North America Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Share by Type (2018-2029)
6.3 North America Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size by Application
6.3.1 North America Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size by Application (2018-2023)
6.3.2 North America Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size by Application (2024-2029)
6.3.3 North America Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Share by Application (2018-2029)
6.4 North America Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size by Country
6.4.1 North America Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size by Country: 2018 VS 2022 VS 2029
6.4.2 North America Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size by Country (2018-2023)
6.4.3 North America Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size by Country (2024-2029)
6.4.4 U.S.
6.4.5 Canada
7 Europe
7.1 Europe Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size (2018-2029)
7.2 Europe Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size by Type
7.2.1 Europe Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size by Type (2018-2023)
7.2.2 Europe Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size by Type (2024-2029)
7.2.3 Europe Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Share by Type (2018-2029)
7.3 Europe Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size by Application
7.3.1 Europe Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size by Application (2018-2023)
7.3.2 Europe Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size by Application (2024-2029)
7.3.3 Europe Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Share by Application (2018-2029)
7.4 Europe Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size by Country
7.4.1 Europe Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size by Country: 2018 VS 2022 VS 2029
7.4.2 Europe Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size by Country (2018-2023)
7.4.3 Europe Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size by Country (2024-2029)
7.4.3 Germany
7.4.4 France
7.4.5 U.K.
7.4.6 Italy
7.4.7 Russia
7.4.8 Nordic Countries
8 China
8.1 China Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size (2018-2029)
8.2 China Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size by Type
8.2.1 China Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size by Type (2018-2023)
8.2.2 China Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size by Type (2024-2029)
8.2.3 China Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Share by Type (2018-2029)
8.3 China Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size by Application
8.3.1 China Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size by Application (2018-2023)
8.3.2 China Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size by Application (2024-2029)
8.3.3 China Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Share by Application (2018-2029)
9 Asia (excluding China)
9.1 Asia Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size (2018-2029)
9.2 Asia Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size by Type
9.2.1 Asia Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size by Type (2018-2023)
9.2.2 Asia Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size by Type (2024-2029)
9.2.3 Asia Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Share by Type (2018-2029)
9.3 Asia Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size by Application
9.3.1 Asia Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size by Application (2018-2023)
9.3.2 Asia Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size by Application (2024-2029)
9.3.3 Asia Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Share by Application (2018-2029)
9.4 Asia Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size by Region
9.4.1 Asia Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size by Region: 2018 VS 2022 VS 2029
9.4.2 Asia Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size by Region (2018-2023)
9.4.3 Asia Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size by Region (2024-2029)
9.4.4 Japan
9.4.5 South Korea
9.4.6 China Taiwan
9.4.7 Southeast Asia
9.4.8 India
9.4.9 Australia
10 Middle East, Africa, and Latin America
10.1 Middle East, Africa, and Latin America Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size (2018-2029)
10.2 Middle East, Africa, and Latin America Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size by Type
10.2.1 Middle East, Africa, and Latin America Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size by Type (2018-2023)
10.2.2 Middle East, Africa, and Latin America Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size by Type (2024-2029)
10.2.3 Middle East, Africa, and Latin America Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Share by Type (2018-2029)
10.3 Middle East, Africa, and Latin America Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size by Application
10.3.1 Middle East, Africa, and Latin America Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size by Application (2018-2023)
10.3.2 Middle East, Africa, and Latin America Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size by Application (2024-2029)
10.3.3 Middle East, Africa, and Latin America Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Share by Application (2018-2029)
10.4 Middle East, Africa, and Latin America Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size by Country
10.4.1 Middle East, Africa, and Latin America Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size by Country: 2018 VS 2022 VS 2029
10.4.2 Middle East, Africa, and Latin America Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size by Country (2018-2023)
10.4.3 Middle East, Africa, and Latin America Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services 麻豆原创 Size by Country (2024-2029)
10.4.4 Brazil
10.4.5 Mexico
10.4.6 Turkey
10.4.7 Saudi Arabia
10.4.8 Israel
10.4.9 GCC Countries
11 Key Players Profiles
11.1 NICE
11.1.1 NICE Company Details
11.1.2 NICE Business Overview
11.1.3 NICE Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services Introduction
11.1.4 NICE Revenue in Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services Business (2018-2023)
11.1.5 NICE Recent Developments
11.2 Oracle
11.2.1 Oracle Company Details
11.2.2 Oracle Business Overview
11.2.3 Oracle Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services Introduction
11.2.4 Oracle Revenue in Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services Business (2018-2023)
11.2.5 Oracle Recent Developments
11.3 FICO
11.3.1 FICO Company Details
11.3.2 FICO Business Overview
11.3.3 FICO Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services Introduction
11.3.4 FICO Revenue in Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services Business (2018-2023)
11.3.5 FICO Recent Developments
11.4 BAE Systems
11.4.1 BAE Systems Company Details
11.4.2 BAE Systems Business Overview
11.4.3 BAE Systems Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services Introduction
11.4.4 BAE Systems Revenue in Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services Business (2018-2023)
11.4.5 BAE Systems Recent Developments
11.5 Fiserv
11.5.1 Fiserv Company Details
11.5.2 Fiserv Business Overview
11.5.3 Fiserv Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services Introduction
11.5.4 Fiserv Revenue in Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services Business (2018-2023)
11.5.5 Fiserv Recent Developments
11.6 SAS
11.6.1 SAS Company Details
11.6.2 SAS Business Overview
11.6.3 SAS Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services Introduction
11.6.4 SAS Revenue in Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services Business (2018-2023)
11.6.5 SAS Recent Developments
11.7 Experian
11.7.1 Experian Company Details
11.7.2 Experian Business Overview
11.7.3 Experian Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services Introduction
11.7.4 Experian Revenue in Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services Business (2018-2023)
11.7.5 Experian Recent Developments
11.8 FIS
11.8.1 FIS Company Details
11.8.2 FIS Business Overview
11.8.3 FIS Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services Introduction
11.8.4 FIS Revenue in Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services Business (2018-2023)
11.8.5 FIS Recent Developments
11.9 ACI Worldwide
11.9.1 ACI Worldwide Company Details
11.9.2 ACI Worldwide Business Overview
11.9.3 ACI Worldwide Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services Introduction
11.9.4 ACI Worldwide Revenue in Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services Business (2018-2023)
11.9.5 ACI Worldwide Recent Developments
11.10 Refinitiv
11.10.1 Refinitiv Company Details
11.10.2 Refinitiv Business Overview
11.10.3 Refinitiv Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services Introduction
11.10.4 Refinitiv Revenue in Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services Business (2018-2023)
11.10.5 Refinitiv Recent Developments
11.11 Software
11.11.1 Software Company Details
11.11.2 Software Business Overview
11.11.3 Software Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services Introduction
11.11.4 Software Revenue in Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services Business (2018-2023)
11.11.5 Software Recent Developments
11.12 ComplyAdvantage
11.12.1 ComplyAdvantage Company Details
11.12.2 ComplyAdvantage Business Overview
11.12.3 ComplyAdvantage Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services Introduction
11.12.4 ComplyAdvantage Revenue in Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services Business (2018-2023)
11.12.5 ComplyAdvantage Recent Developments
11.13 Infrasoft Technologies
11.13.1 Infrasoft Technologies Company Details
11.13.2 Infrasoft Technologies Business Overview
11.13.3 Infrasoft Technologies Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services Introduction
11.13.4 Infrasoft Technologies Revenue in Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services Business (2018-2023)
11.13.5 Infrasoft Technologies Recent Developments
11.14 ACTICO
11.14.1 ACTICO Company Details
11.14.2 ACTICO Business Overview
11.14.3 ACTICO Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services Introduction
11.14.4 ACTICO Revenue in Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services Business (2018-2023)
11.14.5 ACTICO Recent Developments
11.15 EastNets
11.15.1 EastNets Company Details
11.15.2 EastNets Business Overview
11.15.3 EastNets Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services Introduction
11.15.4 EastNets Revenue in Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services Business (2018-2023)
11.15.5 EastNets Recent Developments
11.16 Bottomline
11.16.1 Bottomline Company Details
11.16.2 Bottomline Business Overview
11.16.3 Bottomline Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services Introduction
11.16.4 Bottomline Revenue in Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services Business (2018-2023)
11.16.5 Bottomline Recent Developments
11.17 Beam Solutions
11.17.1 Beam Solutions Company Details
11.17.2 Beam Solutions Business Overview
11.17.3 Beam Solutions Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services Introduction
11.17.4 Beam Solutions Revenue in Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services Business (2018-2023)
11.17.5 Beam Solutions Recent Developments
11.18 IdentityMind
11.18.1 IdentityMind Company Details
11.18.2 IdentityMind Business Overview
11.18.3 IdentityMind Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services Introduction
11.18.4 IdentityMind Revenue in Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services Business (2018-2023)
11.18.5 IdentityMind Recent Developments
11.19 CaseWare
11.19.1 CaseWare Company Details
11.19.2 CaseWare Business Overview
11.19.3 CaseWare Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services Introduction
11.19.4 CaseWare Revenue in Transaction Monitoring for Financial Services Business (2018-2023)
11.19.5 CaseWare Recent Developments
12 Analyst's Viewpoints/Conclusions
13 Appendix
13.1 Research Methodology
13.1.1 Methodology/Research Approach
13.1.2 Data Source
13.2 Disclaimer
13.3 Author Details
NICE
Oracle
FICO
BAE Systems
Fiserv
SAS
Experian
FIS
ACI Worldwide
Refinitiv
Software
ComplyAdvantage
Infrasoft Technologies
ACTICO
EastNets
Bottomline
Beam Solutions
IdentityMind
CaseWare
听
听
*If Applicable.