The global Pipeline Condition Assessment market is projected to reach US$ million in 2029, increasing from US$ million in 2022, with the CAGR of % during the period of 2023 to 2029.
Key companies engaged in the Pipeline Condition Assessment industry include Xylem, ADE Consulting Group, Ecologics, Hydromax USA, Aqua Analytics, Detection Services, OGE, Orbis Intelligent Systems and Procorp, etc. Among those companies, the top 3 players guaranteed % supply worldwide in 2022.
When refers to consumption region, % value of Pipeline Condition Assessment were sold to North America, Europe and Asia Pacific in 2022. Moreover, China, plays a key role in the whole Pipeline Condition Assessment market and estimated to attract more attentions from industry insiders and investors.
Report Scope
This report, based on historical analysis (2018-2022) and forecast calculation (2023-2029), aims to help readers to get a comprehensive understanding of global Pipeline Condition Assessment market with multiple angles, which provides sufficient supports to readers’ strategy and decision making.
By Company
Xylem
ADE Consulting Group
Ecologics
Hydromax USA
Aqua Analytics
Detection Services
OGE
Orbis Intelligent Systems
Procorp
Hydrosave
Lowflo
Alkadyne
Teksu
SGS
VIBRATION
Beijing Anko Science And Technology Group
Segment by Type
Coating Defect Measurement
Water Leak Detection
Soil Sampling
Wall Thickness Measurement
Pipeline Burial Depth
Other
Segment by Application
Drainage Pipes
Gas Pipelines
Oil And Gas Pipelines
Thermal Pipes
Other
By Region
North America
United States
Canada
Europe
Germany
France
UK
Italy
Russia
Nordic Countries
Rest of Europe
Asia-Pacific
China
Japan
South Korea
Southeast Asia
India
Australia
Rest of Asia
Latin America
Mexico
Brazil
Rest of Latin America
Middle East & Africa
Turkey
Saudi Arabia
UAE
Rest of MEA
The Pipeline Condition Assessment report covers below items:
Chapter 1: Product Basic Information (Definition, Type and Application)
Chapter 2: Global market size, regional market size. Âé¶¹Ô´´ Opportunities and Challenges
Chapter 3: Companies’ Competition Patterns
Chapter 4: Product Type Analysis
Chapter 5: Product Application Analysis
Chapter 6 to 10: Country Level Value Analysis
Chapter 11: Companies’ Outline
Chapter 12: Âé¶¹Ô´´ Conclusions
Chapter 13: Research Methodology and Data Source
Please Note - This is an on demand report and will be delivered in 2 business days (48 hours) post payment.
1 Report Overview
1.1 Study Scope
1.2 Âé¶¹Ô´´ Analysis by Type
1.2.1 Global Pipeline Condition Assessment Âé¶¹Ô´´ Size Growth Rate by Type: 2018 VS 2022 VS 2029
1.2.2 Coating Defect Measurement
1.2.3 Water Leak Detection
1.2.4 Soil Sampling
1.2.5 Wall Thickness Measurement
1.2.6 Pipeline Burial Depth
1.2.7 Other
1.3 Âé¶¹Ô´´ by Application
1.3.1 Global Pipeline Condition Assessment Âé¶¹Ô´´ Growth by Application: 2018 VS 2022 VS 2029
1.3.2 Drainage Pipes
1.3.3 Gas Pipelines
1.3.4 Oil And Gas Pipelines
1.3.5 Thermal Pipes
1.3.6 Other
1.4 Study Objectives
1.5 Years Considered
1.6 Years Considered
2 Global Growth Trends
2.1 Global Pipeline Condition Assessment Âé¶¹Ô´´ Perspective (2018-2029)
2.2 Pipeline Condition Assessment Growth Trends by Region
2.2.1 Global Pipeline Condition Assessment Âé¶¹Ô´´ Size by Region: 2018 VS 2022 VS 2029
2.2.2 Pipeline Condition Assessment Historic Âé¶¹Ô´´ Size by Region (2018-2023)
2.2.3 Pipeline Condition Assessment Forecasted Âé¶¹Ô´´ Size by Region (2024-2029)
2.3 Pipeline Condition Assessment Âé¶¹Ô´´ Dynamics
2.3.1 Pipeline Condition Assessment Industry Trends
2.3.2 Pipeline Condition Assessment Âé¶¹Ô´´ Drivers
2.3.3 Pipeline Condition Assessment Âé¶¹Ô´´ Challenges
2.3.4 Pipeline Condition Assessment Âé¶¹Ô´´ Restraints
3 Competition Landscape by Key Players
3.1 Global Top Pipeline Condition Assessment Players by Revenue
3.1.1 Global Top Pipeline Condition Assessment Players by Revenue (2018-2023)
3.1.2 Global Pipeline Condition Assessment Revenue Âé¶¹Ô´´ Share by Players (2018-2023)
3.2 Global Pipeline Condition Assessment Âé¶¹Ô´´ Share by Company Type (Tier 1, Tier 2, and Tier 3)
3.3 Players Covered: Ranking by Pipeline Condition Assessment Revenue
3.4 Global Pipeline Condition Assessment Âé¶¹Ô´´ Concentration Ratio
3.4.1 Global Pipeline Condition Assessment Âé¶¹Ô´´ Concentration Ratio (CR5 and HHI)
3.4.2 Global Top 10 and Top 5 Companies by Pipeline Condition Assessment Revenue in 2022
3.5 Pipeline Condition Assessment Key Players Head office and Area Served
3.6 Key Players Pipeline Condition Assessment Product Solution and Service
3.7 Date of Enter into Pipeline Condition Assessment Âé¶¹Ô´´
3.8 Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion Plans
4 Pipeline Condition Assessment Breakdown Data by Type
4.1 Global Pipeline Condition Assessment Historic Âé¶¹Ô´´ Size by Type (2018-2023)
4.2 Global Pipeline Condition Assessment Forecasted Âé¶¹Ô´´ Size by Type (2024-2029)
5 Pipeline Condition Assessment Breakdown Data by Application
5.1 Global Pipeline Condition Assessment Historic Âé¶¹Ô´´ Size by Application (2018-2023)
5.2 Global Pipeline Condition Assessment Forecasted Âé¶¹Ô´´ Size by Application (2024-2029)
6 North America
6.1 North America Pipeline Condition Assessment Âé¶¹Ô´´ Size (2018-2029)
6.2 North America Pipeline Condition Assessment Âé¶¹Ô´´ Growth Rate by Country: 2018 VS 2022 VS 2029
6.3 North America Pipeline Condition Assessment Âé¶¹Ô´´ Size by Country (2018-2023)
6.4 North America Pipeline Condition Assessment Âé¶¹Ô´´ Size by Country (2024-2029)
6.5 United States
6.6 Canada
7 Europe
7.1 Europe Pipeline Condition Assessment Âé¶¹Ô´´ Size (2018-2029)
7.2 Europe Pipeline Condition Assessment Âé¶¹Ô´´ Growth Rate by Country: 2018 VS 2022 VS 2029
7.3 Europe Pipeline Condition Assessment Âé¶¹Ô´´ Size by Country (2018-2023)
7.4 Europe Pipeline Condition Assessment Âé¶¹Ô´´ Size by Country (2024-2029)
7.5 Germany
7.6 France
7.7 U.K.
7.8 Italy
7.9 Russia
7.10 Nordic Countries
8 Asia-Pacific
8.1 Asia-Pacific Pipeline Condition Assessment Âé¶¹Ô´´ Size (2018-2029)
8.2 Asia-Pacific Pipeline Condition Assessment Âé¶¹Ô´´ Growth Rate by Region: 2018 VS 2022 VS 2029
8.3 Asia-Pacific Pipeline Condition Assessment Âé¶¹Ô´´ Size by Region (2018-2023)
8.4 Asia-Pacific Pipeline Condition Assessment Âé¶¹Ô´´ Size by Region (2024-2029)
8.5 China
8.6 Japan
8.7 South Korea
8.8 Southeast Asia
8.9 India
8.10 Australia
9 Latin America
9.1 Latin America Pipeline Condition Assessment Âé¶¹Ô´´ Size (2018-2029)
9.2 Latin America Pipeline Condition Assessment Âé¶¹Ô´´ Growth Rate by Country: 2018 VS 2022 VS 2029
9.3 Latin America Pipeline Condition Assessment Âé¶¹Ô´´ Size by Country (2018-2023)
9.4 Latin America Pipeline Condition Assessment Âé¶¹Ô´´ Size by Country (2024-2029)
9.5 Mexico
9.6 Brazil
10 Middle East & Africa
10.1 Middle East & Africa Pipeline Condition Assessment Âé¶¹Ô´´ Size (2018-2029)
10.2 Middle East & Africa Pipeline Condition Assessment Âé¶¹Ô´´ Growth Rate by Country: 2018 VS 2022 VS 2029
10.3 Middle East & Africa Pipeline Condition Assessment Âé¶¹Ô´´ Size by Country (2018-2023)
10.4 Middle East & Africa Pipeline Condition Assessment Âé¶¹Ô´´ Size by Country (2024-2029)
10.5 Turkey
10.6 Saudi Arabia
10.7 UAE
11 Key Players Profiles
11.1 Xylem
11.1.1 Xylem Company Detail
11.1.2 Xylem Business Overview
11.1.3 Xylem Pipeline Condition Assessment Introduction
11.1.4 Xylem Revenue in Pipeline Condition Assessment Business (2018-2023)
11.1.5 Xylem Recent Development
11.2 ADE Consulting Group
11.2.1 ADE Consulting Group Company Detail
11.2.2 ADE Consulting Group Business Overview
11.2.3 ADE Consulting Group Pipeline Condition Assessment Introduction
11.2.4 ADE Consulting Group Revenue in Pipeline Condition Assessment Business (2018-2023)
11.2.5 ADE Consulting Group Recent Development
11.3 Ecologics
11.3.1 Ecologics Company Detail
11.3.2 Ecologics Business Overview
11.3.3 Ecologics Pipeline Condition Assessment Introduction
11.3.4 Ecologics Revenue in Pipeline Condition Assessment Business (2018-2023)
11.3.5 Ecologics Recent Development
11.4 Hydromax USA
11.4.1 Hydromax USA Company Detail
11.4.2 Hydromax USA Business Overview
11.4.3 Hydromax USA Pipeline Condition Assessment Introduction
11.4.4 Hydromax USA Revenue in Pipeline Condition Assessment Business (2018-2023)
11.4.5 Hydromax USA Recent Development
11.5 Aqua Analytics
11.5.1 Aqua Analytics Company Detail
11.5.2 Aqua Analytics Business Overview
11.5.3 Aqua Analytics Pipeline Condition Assessment Introduction
11.5.4 Aqua Analytics Revenue in Pipeline Condition Assessment Business (2018-2023)
11.5.5 Aqua Analytics Recent Development
11.6 Detection Services
11.6.1 Detection Services Company Detail
11.6.2 Detection Services Business Overview
11.6.3 Detection Services Pipeline Condition Assessment Introduction
11.6.4 Detection Services Revenue in Pipeline Condition Assessment Business (2018-2023)
11.6.5 Detection Services Recent Development
11.7 OGE
11.7.1 OGE Company Detail
11.7.2 OGE Business Overview
11.7.3 OGE Pipeline Condition Assessment Introduction
11.7.4 OGE Revenue in Pipeline Condition Assessment Business (2018-2023)
11.7.5 OGE Recent Development
11.8 Orbis Intelligent Systems
11.8.1 Orbis Intelligent Systems Company Detail
11.8.2 Orbis Intelligent Systems Business Overview
11.8.3 Orbis Intelligent Systems Pipeline Condition Assessment Introduction
11.8.4 Orbis Intelligent Systems Revenue in Pipeline Condition Assessment Business (2018-2023)
11.8.5 Orbis Intelligent Systems Recent Development
11.9 Procorp
11.9.1 Procorp Company Detail
11.9.2 Procorp Business Overview
11.9.3 Procorp Pipeline Condition Assessment Introduction
11.9.4 Procorp Revenue in Pipeline Condition Assessment Business (2018-2023)
11.9.5 Procorp Recent Development
11.10 Hydrosave
11.10.1 Hydrosave Company Detail
11.10.2 Hydrosave Business Overview
11.10.3 Hydrosave Pipeline Condition Assessment Introduction
11.10.4 Hydrosave Revenue in Pipeline Condition Assessment Business (2018-2023)
11.10.5 Hydrosave Recent Development
11.11 Lowflo
11.11.1 Lowflo Company Detail
11.11.2 Lowflo Business Overview
11.11.3 Lowflo Pipeline Condition Assessment Introduction
11.11.4 Lowflo Revenue in Pipeline Condition Assessment Business (2018-2023)
11.11.5 Lowflo Recent Development
11.12 Alkadyne
11.12.1 Alkadyne Company Detail
11.12.2 Alkadyne Business Overview
11.12.3 Alkadyne Pipeline Condition Assessment Introduction
11.12.4 Alkadyne Revenue in Pipeline Condition Assessment Business (2018-2023)
11.12.5 Alkadyne Recent Development
11.13 Teksu
11.13.1 Teksu Company Detail
11.13.2 Teksu Business Overview
11.13.3 Teksu Pipeline Condition Assessment Introduction
11.13.4 Teksu Revenue in Pipeline Condition Assessment Business (2018-2023)
11.13.5 Teksu Recent Development
11.14 SGS
11.14.1 SGS Company Detail
11.14.2 SGS Business Overview
11.14.3 SGS Pipeline Condition Assessment Introduction
11.14.4 SGS Revenue in Pipeline Condition Assessment Business (2018-2023)
11.14.5 SGS Recent Development
11.15 VIBRATION
11.15.1 VIBRATION Company Detail
11.15.2 VIBRATION Business Overview
11.15.3 VIBRATION Pipeline Condition Assessment Introduction
11.15.4 VIBRATION Revenue in Pipeline Condition Assessment Business (2018-2023)
11.15.5 VIBRATION Recent Development
11.16 Beijing Anko Science And Technology Group
11.16.1 Beijing Anko Science And Technology Group Company Detail
11.16.2 Beijing Anko Science And Technology Group Business Overview
11.16.3 Beijing Anko Science And Technology Group Pipeline Condition Assessment Introduction
11.16.4 Beijing Anko Science And Technology Group Revenue in Pipeline Condition Assessment Business (2018-2023)
11.16.5 Beijing Anko Science And Technology Group Recent Development
12 Analyst's Viewpoints/Conclusions
13 Appendix
13.1 Research Methodology
13.1.1 Methodology/Research Approach
13.1.2 Data Source
13.2 Disclaimer
13.3 Author Details
Xylem
ADE Consulting Group
Ecologics
Hydromax USA
Aqua Analytics
Detection Services
OGE
Orbis Intelligent Systems
Procorp
Hydrosave
Lowflo
Alkadyne
Teksu
SGS
VIBRATION
Beijing Anko Science And Technology Group
Ìý
Ìý
*If Applicable.