The Physical Internet (PI) is a concept or a vision for the future of logistics that describes a new way to organize the flow of goods through a highly interconnected and interoperable logistics network. It is not a physical or tangible product or technology that can be classified into a specific type.
PI concept involves the use of advanced technologies, including Internet of Things (IoT), artificial intelligence (AI), blockchain, and other digital tools, to create a seamless flow of goods through modular, standardized, and open logistics spaces and networks.
In transportation, the Physical Internet refers to the combination of digital transportation networks that are deploying to replace actual road networks.The Physical Internet (PI) is a new boundary-spanning area of research and practice that seeks to address this grand challenge. The aim of the PI is to optimize logistics and SCM processes so as to create more efficient, effective and sustainable supply chains (SCs)
The global Physical Internet (PI) market is projected to reach US$ million in 2029, increasing from US$ million in 2022, with the CAGR of % during the period of 2023 to 2029.
The global Physical Internet (PI) market refers to the emerging concept and network of interconnected physical and digital logistics infrastructure that aims to optimize the global movement of goods, materials, and information. The PI concept is inspired by the digital internet and aims to revolutionize the way goods are transported, stored, and distributed in a more efficient, sustainable, and coordinated manner.
Here are some key insights into the global Physical Internet market:
麻豆原创 Size and Growth: The Physical Internet concept is still in its early stages of development, and as such, the market size is difficult to quantify accurately. However, the concept has been gaining traction in various industries and is expected to grow significantly in the coming years as technology adoption and infrastructure development progress.
Key Components of the Physical Internet: The Physical Internet is comprised of various components, including interconnected logistics hubs, standardized modular containers, intelligent logistics systems, real-time data exchange platforms, and advanced analytics and optimization algorithms. These components work together to enable seamless and efficient movement of goods across the entire supply chain.
Benefits of the Physical Internet: The adoption of the Physical Internet has the potential to bring several benefits to the global supply chain. These include improved transportation efficiency, reduced congestion and emissions, increased resource utilization, enhanced supply chain visibility and traceability, reduced inventory holding costs, and greater overall sustainability.
Technological Enablers: The successful implementation of the Physical Internet relies on the integration of various advanced technologies, such as Internet of Things (IoT), big data analytics, artificial intelligence, blockchain, and autonomous vehicles. These technologies enable real-time tracking, intelligent decision-making, dynamic routing, and overall optimization of logistics operations.
Industry Applications: The Physical Internet concept can be applied across various industries, including retail, e-commerce, manufacturing, healthcare, and logistics. It is particularly relevant for industries that rely heavily on supply chains and transportation networks.
Adoption Challenges: The implementation of the Physical Internet faces certain challenges, including the need for standardization and collaboration among various stakeholders, the required investment in infrastructure and technology, regulatory and legal considerations, and the change management required to transition from traditional supply chain models to the PI paradigm.
Global Initiatives and Pilot Projects: Several countries and organizations around the world have recognized the potential of the Physical Internet and have launched initiatives and pilot projects to explore its feasibility and benefits. These projects aim to test and refine the concept, gather data, and validate the potential economic and environmental impacts.
Key Players and Stakeholders: The development and implementation of the Physical Internet involve collaboration among stakeholders from various sectors, including logistics service providers, transportation companies, infrastructure providers, technology developers, government agencies, and academic institutions. Collaboration and partnerships among these stakeholders are crucial to realizing the full potential of the Physical Internet.
The global Physical Internet market holds immense potential to transform the way goods are transported and logistics operations are managed globally. The concept aims to optimize resource utilization, reduce transportation inefficiencies, and improve the overall sustainability of supply chains. As technology advances and adoption increases, we can expect further growth and development in this market, ultimately leading to a more interconnected and efficient global logistics network.The global Physical Internet (PI) market refers to the emerging concept and network of interconnected physical and digital logistics infrastructure that aims to optimize the global movement of goods, materials, and information. The PI concept is inspired by the digital internet and aims to revolutionize the way goods are transported, stored, and distributed in a more efficient, sustainable, and coordinated manner.
Here are some key insights into the global Physical Internet market:
麻豆原创 Size and Growth: The Physical Internet concept is still in its early stages of development, and as such, the market size is difficult to quantify accurately. However, the concept has been gaining traction in various industries and is expected to grow significantly in the coming years as technology adoption and infrastructure development progress.
Key Components of the Physical Internet: The Physical Internet is comprised of various components, including interconnected logistics hubs, standardized modular containers, intelligent logistics systems, real-time data exchange platforms, and advanced analytics and optimization algorithms. These components work together to enable seamless and efficient movement of goods across the entire supply chain.
Benefits of the Physical Internet: The adoption of the Physical Internet has the potential to bring several benefits to the global supply chain. These include improved transportation efficiency, reduced congestion and emissions, increased resource utilization, enhanced supply chain visibility and traceability, reduced inventory holding costs, and greater overall sustainability.
Technological Enablers: The successful implementation of the Physical Internet relies on the integration of various advanced technologies, such as Internet of Things (IoT), big data analytics, artificial intelligence, blockchain, and autonomous vehicles. These technologies enable real-time tracking, intelligent decision-making, dynamic routing, and overall optimization of logistics operations.
Industry Applications: The Physical Internet concept can be applied across various industries, including retail, e-commerce, manufacturing, healthcare, and logistics. It is particularly relevant for industries that rely heavily on supply chains and transportation networks.
Adoption Challenges: The implementation of the Physical Internet faces certain challenges, including the need for standardization and collaboration among various stakeholders, the required investment in infrastructure and technology, regulatory and legal considerations, and the change management required to transition from traditional supply chain models to the PI paradigm.
Global Initiatives and Pilot Projects: Several countries and organizations around the world have recognized the potential of the Physical Internet and have launched initiatives and pilot projects to explore its feasibility and benefits. These projects aim to test and refine the concept, gather data, and validate the potential economic and environmental impacts.
Key Players and Stakeholders: The development and implementation of the Physical Internet involve collaboration among stakeholders from various sectors, including logistics service providers, transportation companies, infrastructure providers, technology developers, government agencies, and academic institutions. Collaboration and partnerships among these stakeholders are crucial to realizing the full potential of the Physical Internet.
The global Physical Internet market holds immense potential to transform the way goods are transported and logistics operations are managed globally. The concept aims to optimize resource utilization, reduce transportation inefficiencies, and improve the overall sustainability of supply chains. As technology advances and adoption increases, we can expect further growth and development in this market, ultimately leading to a more interconnected and efficient global logistics network.
Report Scope
This report, based on historical analysis (2018-2022) and forecast calculation (2023-2029), aims to help readers to get a comprehensive understanding of global Physical Internet (PI) market with multiple angles, which provides sufficient supports to readers鈥� strategy and decision making.
By Company
Amazon
UPS
IBM
Maersk
Flexport
XPO Logistics
Kuehne + Nagel
Deutsche Post DHL Group
AmeriCold Logistics LLC
Mercedes-Benz Group AG
SF Express
Yamato Logistics Ltd
DHL
FedEx Corporation
Velove Bikes AB
MIXMOVE
Segment by Type
Planning and Consulting
Integration and Deployment
Support and Maintenance
Segment by Application
Retail & E-Commerce
Transportation & Logistics
Pharmaceutical & Health
Manufacturing
Automotive
Aerospace
Defense
By Region
North America
United States
Canada
Europe
Germany
France
UK
Italy
Russia
Nordic Countries
Rest of Europe
Asia-Pacific
China
Japan
South Korea
Southeast Asia
India
Australia
Rest of Asia
Latin America
Mexico
Brazil
Rest of Latin America
Middle East & Africa
Turkey
Saudi Arabia
UAE
Rest of MEA
The Physical Internet (PI) report covers below items:
Chapter 1: Product Basic Information (Definition, Type and Application)
Chapter 2: Global market size, regional market size. 麻豆原创 Opportunities and Challenges
Chapter 3: Companies鈥� Competition Patterns
Chapter 4: Product Type Analysis
Chapter 5: Product Application Analysis
Chapter 6 to 10: Country Level Value Analysis
Chapter 11: Companies鈥� Outline
Chapter 12: 麻豆原创 Conclusions
Chapter 13: Research Methodology and Data Source
Please Note - This is an on demand report and will be delivered in 2 business days (48 hours) post payment.
1 Report Overview
1.1 Study Scope
1.2 麻豆原创 Analysis by Type
1.2.1 Global Physical Internet (PI) 麻豆原创 Size Growth Rate by Type: 2018 VS 2022 VS 2029
1.2.2 Planning and Consulting
1.2.3 Integration and Deployment
1.2.4 Support and Maintenance
1.3 麻豆原创 by Application
1.3.1 Global Physical Internet (PI) 麻豆原创 Growth by Application: 2018 VS 2022 VS 2029
1.3.2 Retail & E-Commerce
1.3.3 Transportation & Logistics
1.3.4 Pharmaceutical & Health
1.3.5 Manufacturing
1.3.6 Automotive
1.3.7 Aerospace
1.3.8 Defense
1.4 Study Objectives
1.5 Years Considered
1.6 Years Considered
2 Global Growth Trends
2.1 Global Physical Internet (PI) 麻豆原创 Perspective (2018-2029)
2.2 Physical Internet (PI) Growth Trends by Region
2.2.1 Global Physical Internet (PI) 麻豆原创 Size by Region: 2018 VS 2022 VS 2029
2.2.2 Physical Internet (PI) Historic 麻豆原创 Size by Region (2018-2023)
2.2.3 Physical Internet (PI) Forecasted 麻豆原创 Size by Region (2024-2029)
2.3 Physical Internet (PI) 麻豆原创 Dynamics
2.3.1 Physical Internet (PI) Industry Trends
2.3.2 Physical Internet (PI) 麻豆原创 Drivers
2.3.3 Physical Internet (PI) 麻豆原创 Challenges
2.3.4 Physical Internet (PI) 麻豆原创 Restraints
3 Competition Landscape by Key Players
3.1 Global Top Physical Internet (PI) Players by Revenue
3.1.1 Global Top Physical Internet (PI) Players by Revenue (2018-2023)
3.1.2 Global Physical Internet (PI) Revenue 麻豆原创 Share by Players (2018-2023)
3.2 Global Physical Internet (PI) 麻豆原创 Share by Company Type (Tier 1, Tier 2, and Tier 3)
3.3 Players Covered: Ranking by Physical Internet (PI) Revenue
3.4 Global Physical Internet (PI) 麻豆原创 Concentration Ratio
3.4.1 Global Physical Internet (PI) 麻豆原创 Concentration Ratio (CR5 and HHI)
3.4.2 Global Top 10 and Top 5 Companies by Physical Internet (PI) Revenue in 2022
3.5 Physical Internet (PI) Key Players Head office and Area Served
3.6 Key Players Physical Internet (PI) Product Solution and Service
3.7 Date of Enter into Physical Internet (PI) 麻豆原创
3.8 Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion Plans
4 Physical Internet (PI) Breakdown Data by Type
4.1 Global Physical Internet (PI) Historic 麻豆原创 Size by Type (2018-2023)
4.2 Global Physical Internet (PI) Forecasted 麻豆原创 Size by Type (2024-2029)
5 Physical Internet (PI) Breakdown Data by Application
5.1 Global Physical Internet (PI) Historic 麻豆原创 Size by Application (2018-2023)
5.2 Global Physical Internet (PI) Forecasted 麻豆原创 Size by Application (2024-2029)
6 North America
6.1 North America Physical Internet (PI) 麻豆原创 Size (2018-2029)
6.2 North America Physical Internet (PI) 麻豆原创 Growth Rate by Country: 2018 VS 2022 VS 2029
6.3 North America Physical Internet (PI) 麻豆原创 Size by Country (2018-2023)
6.4 North America Physical Internet (PI) 麻豆原创 Size by Country (2024-2029)
6.5 United States
6.6 Canada
7 Europe
7.1 Europe Physical Internet (PI) 麻豆原创 Size (2018-2029)
7.2 Europe Physical Internet (PI) 麻豆原创 Growth Rate by Country: 2018 VS 2022 VS 2029
7.3 Europe Physical Internet (PI) 麻豆原创 Size by Country (2018-2023)
7.4 Europe Physical Internet (PI) 麻豆原创 Size by Country (2024-2029)
7.5 Germany
7.6 France
7.7 U.K.
7.8 Italy
7.9 Russia
7.10 Nordic Countries
8 Asia-Pacific
8.1 Asia-Pacific Physical Internet (PI) 麻豆原创 Size (2018-2029)
8.2 Asia-Pacific Physical Internet (PI) 麻豆原创 Growth Rate by Region: 2018 VS 2022 VS 2029
8.3 Asia-Pacific Physical Internet (PI) 麻豆原创 Size by Region (2018-2023)
8.4 Asia-Pacific Physical Internet (PI) 麻豆原创 Size by Region (2024-2029)
8.5 China
8.6 Japan
8.7 South Korea
8.8 Southeast Asia
8.9 India
8.10 Australia
9 Latin America
9.1 Latin America Physical Internet (PI) 麻豆原创 Size (2018-2029)
9.2 Latin America Physical Internet (PI) 麻豆原创 Growth Rate by Country: 2018 VS 2022 VS 2029
9.3 Latin America Physical Internet (PI) 麻豆原创 Size by Country (2018-2023)
9.4 Latin America Physical Internet (PI) 麻豆原创 Size by Country (2024-2029)
9.5 Mexico
9.6 Brazil
10 Middle East & Africa
10.1 Middle East & Africa Physical Internet (PI) 麻豆原创 Size (2018-2029)
10.2 Middle East & Africa Physical Internet (PI) 麻豆原创 Growth Rate by Country: 2018 VS 2022 VS 2029
10.3 Middle East & Africa Physical Internet (PI) 麻豆原创 Size by Country (2018-2023)
10.4 Middle East & Africa Physical Internet (PI) 麻豆原创 Size by Country (2024-2029)
10.5 Turkey
10.6 Saudi Arabia
10.7 UAE
11 Key Players Profiles
11.1 Amazon
11.1.1 Amazon Company Detail
11.1.2 Amazon Business Overview
11.1.3 Amazon Physical Internet (PI) Introduction
11.1.4 Amazon Revenue in Physical Internet (PI) Business (2018-2023)
11.1.5 Amazon Recent Development
11.2 UPS
11.2.1 UPS Company Detail
11.2.2 UPS Business Overview
11.2.3 UPS Physical Internet (PI) Introduction
11.2.4 UPS Revenue in Physical Internet (PI) Business (2018-2023)
11.2.5 UPS Recent Development
11.3 IBM
11.3.1 IBM Company Detail
11.3.2 IBM Business Overview
11.3.3 IBM Physical Internet (PI) Introduction
11.3.4 IBM Revenue in Physical Internet (PI) Business (2018-2023)
11.3.5 IBM Recent Development
11.4 Maersk
11.4.1 Maersk Company Detail
11.4.2 Maersk Business Overview
11.4.3 Maersk Physical Internet (PI) Introduction
11.4.4 Maersk Revenue in Physical Internet (PI) Business (2018-2023)
11.4.5 Maersk Recent Development
11.5 Flexport
11.5.1 Flexport Company Detail
11.5.2 Flexport Business Overview
11.5.3 Flexport Physical Internet (PI) Introduction
11.5.4 Flexport Revenue in Physical Internet (PI) Business (2018-2023)
11.5.5 Flexport Recent Development
11.6 XPO Logistics
11.6.1 XPO Logistics Company Detail
11.6.2 XPO Logistics Business Overview
11.6.3 XPO Logistics Physical Internet (PI) Introduction
11.6.4 XPO Logistics Revenue in Physical Internet (PI) Business (2018-2023)
11.6.5 XPO Logistics Recent Development
11.7 Kuehne + Nagel
11.7.1 Kuehne + Nagel Company Detail
11.7.2 Kuehne + Nagel Business Overview
11.7.3 Kuehne + Nagel Physical Internet (PI) Introduction
11.7.4 Kuehne + Nagel Revenue in Physical Internet (PI) Business (2018-2023)
11.7.5 Kuehne + Nagel Recent Development
11.8 Deutsche Post DHL Group
11.8.1 Deutsche Post DHL Group Company Detail
11.8.2 Deutsche Post DHL Group Business Overview
11.8.3 Deutsche Post DHL Group Physical Internet (PI) Introduction
11.8.4 Deutsche Post DHL Group Revenue in Physical Internet (PI) Business (2018-2023)
11.8.5 Deutsche Post DHL Group Recent Development
11.9 AmeriCold Logistics LLC
11.9.1 AmeriCold Logistics LLC Company Detail
11.9.2 AmeriCold Logistics LLC Business Overview
11.9.3 AmeriCold Logistics LLC Physical Internet (PI) Introduction
11.9.4 AmeriCold Logistics LLC Revenue in Physical Internet (PI) Business (2018-2023)
11.9.5 AmeriCold Logistics LLC Recent Development
11.10 Mercedes-Benz Group AG
11.10.1 Mercedes-Benz Group AG Company Detail
11.10.2 Mercedes-Benz Group AG Business Overview
11.10.3 Mercedes-Benz Group AG Physical Internet (PI) Introduction
11.10.4 Mercedes-Benz Group AG Revenue in Physical Internet (PI) Business (2018-2023)
11.10.5 Mercedes-Benz Group AG Recent Development
11.11 SF Express
11.11.1 SF Express Company Detail
11.11.2 SF Express Business Overview
11.11.3 SF Express Physical Internet (PI) Introduction
11.11.4 SF Express Revenue in Physical Internet (PI) Business (2018-2023)
11.11.5 SF Express Recent Development
11.12 Yamato Logistics Ltd
11.12.1 Yamato Logistics Ltd Company Detail
11.12.2 Yamato Logistics Ltd Business Overview
11.12.3 Yamato Logistics Ltd Physical Internet (PI) Introduction
11.12.4 Yamato Logistics Ltd Revenue in Physical Internet (PI) Business (2018-2023)
11.12.5 Yamato Logistics Ltd Recent Development
11.13 DHL
11.13.1 DHL Company Detail
11.13.2 DHL Business Overview
11.13.3 DHL Physical Internet (PI) Introduction
11.13.4 DHL Revenue in Physical Internet (PI) Business (2018-2023)
11.13.5 DHL Recent Development
11.14 FedEx Corporation
11.14.1 FedEx Corporation Company Detail
11.14.2 FedEx Corporation Business Overview
11.14.3 FedEx Corporation Physical Internet (PI) Introduction
11.14.4 FedEx Corporation Revenue in Physical Internet (PI) Business (2018-2023)
11.14.5 FedEx Corporation Recent Development
11.15 Velove Bikes AB
11.15.1 Velove Bikes AB Company Detail
11.15.2 Velove Bikes AB Business Overview
11.15.3 Velove Bikes AB Physical Internet (PI) Introduction
11.15.4 Velove Bikes AB Revenue in Physical Internet (PI) Business (2018-2023)
11.15.5 Velove Bikes AB Recent Development
11.16 MIXMOVE
11.16.1 MIXMOVE Company Detail
11.16.2 MIXMOVE Business Overview
11.16.3 MIXMOVE Physical Internet (PI) Introduction
11.16.4 MIXMOVE Revenue in Physical Internet (PI) Business (2018-2023)
11.16.5 MIXMOVE Recent Development
12 Analyst's Viewpoints/Conclusions
13 Appendix
13.1 Research Methodology
13.1.1 Methodology/Research Approach
13.1.2 Data Source
13.2 Disclaimer
13.3 Author Details
Amazon
UPS
IBM
Maersk
Flexport
XPO Logistics
Kuehne + Nagel
Deutsche Post DHL Group
AmeriCold Logistics LLC
Mercedes-Benz Group AG
SF Express
Yamato Logistics Ltd
DHL
FedEx Corporation
Velove Bikes AB
MIXMOVE
听
听
*If Applicable.