
On March 7th, 2023, Pacific Standard Time, Ranga Dias and his team at the University of Rochester in New York announced a significant breakthrough in the field of room-temperature superconductivity at the American Physical Society conference held in Las Vegas. In their report titled "Superconducting Properties of Hydrides Under Near Room-Temperature and High-Pressure Conditions," the Dias team observed superconductivity in a new material made of hydrogen, nitrogen, and lutetium under 1GPa pressure and near-room-temperature conditions of 294K (21°C).
Normal temperature superconductivity (NTS) refers to the hypothetical ability of a material to conduct electricity with zero resistance at room temperature or higher. Currently, superconductivity is only observed at very low temperatures, typically below -100°C, which limits the practical applications of superconductors.
The development of NTS technology would revolutionize many fields, from power transmission to medical imaging to transportation. However, it is still a highly speculative area of research, and no known material exhibits superconductivity at room temperature or higher.
The global Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology market was valued at US$ million in 2022 and is anticipated to reach US$ million by 2029, witnessing a CAGR of % during the forecast period 2023-2029. The influence of COVID-19 and the Russia-Ukraine War were considered while estimating market sizes.
North American market for Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology is estimated to increase from $ million in 2023 to reach $ million by 2029, at a CAGR of % during the forecast period of 2023 through 2029.
Asia-Pacific market for Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology is estimated to increase from $ million in 2023 to reach $ million by 2029, at a CAGR of % during the forecast period of 2023 through 2029.
The global market for Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology in Superconducting Electricity is estimated to increase from $ million in 2023 to $ million by 2029, at a CAGR of % during the forecast period of 2023 through 2029.
The key global companies of Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology include Team Ranga Dias, University of Rochester, New York, IBM, University of Houston, University of Tokyo, Los Alamos National Laboratory, University of Cambridge, University of Maryland, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and University of Oslo, etc. In 2022, the world's top three vendors accounted for approximately % of the revenue.
Report Scope
This report aims to provide a comprehensive presentation of the global market for Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology, with both quantitative and qualitative analysis, to help readers develop business/growth strategies, assess the market competitive situation, analyze their position in the current marketplace, and make informed business decisions regarding Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology.
The Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology market size, estimations, and forecasts are provided in terms of and revenue ($ millions), considering 2022 as the base year, with history and forecast data for the period from 2018 to 2029. This report segments the global Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology market comprehensively. Regional market sizes, concerning products by type, by application, and by players, are also provided.
For a more in-depth understanding of the market, the report provides profiles of the competitive landscape, key competitors, and their respective market ranks. The report also discusses technological trends and new product developments.
The report will help the Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology companies, new entrants, and industry chain related companies in this market with information on the revenues for the overall market and the sub-segments across the different segments, by company, by type, by application, and by regions.
By Company
Team Ranga Dias, University of Rochester, New York
IBM
University of Houston
University of Tokyo
Los Alamos National Laboratory
University of Cambridge
University of Maryland
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
University of Oslo
University of Geneva
Segment by Type
2.67 Million Atmospheres of Pressure
10,000 Atmospheres of Pressure
Others
Segment by Application
Superconducting Electricity
Superconducting Resonance Medical
Maglev Transportation
Others
By Region
North America
United States
Canada
Europe
Germany
France
UK
Italy
Russia
Nordic Countries
Rest of Europe
Asia-Pacific
China
Japan
South Korea
Southeast Asia
India
Australia
Rest of Asia
Latin America
Mexico
Brazil
Rest of Latin America
Middle East & Africa
Turkey
Saudi Arabia
UAE
Rest of MEA
Core Chapters
Chapter 1: Introduces the report scope of the report, executive summary of different market segments (by type, application, etc), including the market size of each market segment, future development potential, and so on. It offers a high-level view of the current state of the market and its likely evolution in the short to mid-term, and long term.
Chapter 2: Introduces executive summary of global market size, regional market size, this section also introduces the market dynamics, latest developments of the market, the driving factors and restrictive factors of the market, the challenges and risks faced by companies in the industry, and the analysis of relevant policies in the industry.
Chapter 3: Detailed analysis of Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology companies’ competitive landscape, revenue market share, latest development plan, merger, and acquisition information, etc.
Chapter 4: Provides the analysis of various market segments by type, covering the market size and development potential of each market segment, to help readers find the blue ocean market in different market segments.
Chapter 5: Provides the analysis of various market segments by application, covering the market size and development potential of each market segment, to help readers find the blue ocean market in different downstream markets.
Chapter 6, 7, 8, 9, 10: North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Middle East and Africa segment by country. It provides a quantitative analysis of the market size and development potential of each region and its main countries and introduces the market development, future development prospects, market space, and capacity of each country in the world.
Chapter 11: Provides profiles of key players, introducing the basic situation of the key companies in the market in detail, including product revenue, gross margin, product introduction, recent development, etc.
Chapter 12: The main points and conclusions of the report.
Please Note - This is an on demand report and will be delivered in 2 business days (48 hours) post payment.
1 Report Overview
1.1 Study Scope
1.2 Âé¶¹Ô´´ Analysis by Type
1.2.1 Global Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Âé¶¹Ô´´ Size Growth Rate by Type: 2018 VS 2022 VS 2029
1.2.2 2.67 Million Atmospheres of Pressure
1.2.3 10,000 Atmospheres of Pressure
1.2.4 Others
1.3 Âé¶¹Ô´´ by Application
1.3.1 Global Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Âé¶¹Ô´´ Growth by Application: 2018 VS 2022 VS 2029
1.3.2 Superconducting Electricity
1.3.3 Superconducting Resonance Medical
1.3.4 Maglev Transportation
1.3.5 Others
1.4 Study Objectives
1.5 Years Considered
1.6 Years Considered
2 Global Growth Trends
2.1 Global Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Âé¶¹Ô´´ Perspective (2018-2029)
2.2 Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Growth Trends by Region
2.2.1 Global Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Âé¶¹Ô´´ Size by Region: 2018 VS 2022 VS 2029
2.2.2 Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Historic Âé¶¹Ô´´ Size by Region (2018-2023)
2.2.3 Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Forecasted Âé¶¹Ô´´ Size by Region (2024-2029)
2.3 Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Âé¶¹Ô´´ Dynamics
2.3.1 Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Industry Trends
2.3.2 Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Âé¶¹Ô´´ Drivers
2.3.3 Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Âé¶¹Ô´´ Challenges
2.3.4 Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Âé¶¹Ô´´ Restraints
3 Competition Landscape by Key Players
3.1 Global Top Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Players by Revenue
3.1.1 Global Top Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Players by Revenue (2018-2023)
3.1.2 Global Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Revenue Âé¶¹Ô´´ Share by Players (2018-2023)
3.2 Global Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Âé¶¹Ô´´ Share by Company Type (Tier 1, Tier 2, and Tier 3)
3.3 Players Covered: Ranking by Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Revenue
3.4 Global Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Âé¶¹Ô´´ Concentration Ratio
3.4.1 Global Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Âé¶¹Ô´´ Concentration Ratio (CR5 and HHI)
3.4.2 Global Top 10 and Top 5 Companies by Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Revenue in 2022
3.5 Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Key Players Head office and Area Served
3.6 Key Players Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Product Solution and Service
3.7 Date of Enter into Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Âé¶¹Ô´´
3.8 Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion Plans
4 Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Breakdown Data by Type
4.1 Global Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Historic Âé¶¹Ô´´ Size by Type (2018-2023)
4.2 Global Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Forecasted Âé¶¹Ô´´ Size by Type (2024-2029)
5 Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Breakdown Data by Application
5.1 Global Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Historic Âé¶¹Ô´´ Size by Application (2018-2023)
5.2 Global Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Forecasted Âé¶¹Ô´´ Size by Application (2024-2029)
6 North America
6.1 North America Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Âé¶¹Ô´´ Size (2018-2029)
6.2 North America Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Âé¶¹Ô´´ Growth Rate by Country: 2018 VS 2022 VS 2029
6.3 North America Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Âé¶¹Ô´´ Size by Country (2018-2023)
6.4 North America Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Âé¶¹Ô´´ Size by Country (2024-2029)
6.5 United States
6.6 Canada
7 Europe
7.1 Europe Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Âé¶¹Ô´´ Size (2018-2029)
7.2 Europe Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Âé¶¹Ô´´ Growth Rate by Country: 2018 VS 2022 VS 2029
7.3 Europe Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Âé¶¹Ô´´ Size by Country (2018-2023)
7.4 Europe Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Âé¶¹Ô´´ Size by Country (2024-2029)
7.5 Germany
7.6 France
7.7 U.K.
7.8 Italy
7.9 Russia
7.10 Nordic Countries
8 Asia-Pacific
8.1 Asia-Pacific Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Âé¶¹Ô´´ Size (2018-2029)
8.2 Asia-Pacific Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Âé¶¹Ô´´ Growth Rate by Region: 2018 VS 2022 VS 2029
8.3 Asia-Pacific Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Âé¶¹Ô´´ Size by Region (2018-2023)
8.4 Asia-Pacific Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Âé¶¹Ô´´ Size by Region (2024-2029)
8.5 China
8.6 Japan
8.7 South Korea
8.8 Southeast Asia
8.9 India
8.10 Australia
9 Latin America
9.1 Latin America Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Âé¶¹Ô´´ Size (2018-2029)
9.2 Latin America Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Âé¶¹Ô´´ Growth Rate by Country: 2018 VS 2022 VS 2029
9.3 Latin America Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Âé¶¹Ô´´ Size by Country (2018-2023)
9.4 Latin America Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Âé¶¹Ô´´ Size by Country (2024-2029)
9.5 Mexico
9.6 Brazil
10 Middle East & Africa
10.1 Middle East & Africa Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Âé¶¹Ô´´ Size (2018-2029)
10.2 Middle East & Africa Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Âé¶¹Ô´´ Growth Rate by Country: 2018 VS 2022 VS 2029
10.3 Middle East & Africa Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Âé¶¹Ô´´ Size by Country (2018-2023)
10.4 Middle East & Africa Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Âé¶¹Ô´´ Size by Country (2024-2029)
10.5 Turkey
10.6 Saudi Arabia
10.7 UAE
11 Key Players Profiles
11.1 Team Ranga Dias, University of Rochester, New York
11.1.1 Team Ranga Dias, University of Rochester, New York Company Detail
11.1.2 Team Ranga Dias, University of Rochester, New York Business Overview
11.1.3 Team Ranga Dias, University of Rochester, New York Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Introduction
11.1.4 Team Ranga Dias, University of Rochester, New York Revenue in Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Business (2018-2023)
11.1.5 Team Ranga Dias, University of Rochester, New York Recent Development
11.2 IBM
11.2.1 IBM Company Detail
11.2.2 IBM Business Overview
11.2.3 IBM Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Introduction
11.2.4 IBM Revenue in Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Business (2018-2023)
11.2.5 IBM Recent Development
11.3 University of Houston
11.3.1 University of Houston Company Detail
11.3.2 University of Houston Business Overview
11.3.3 University of Houston Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Introduction
11.3.4 University of Houston Revenue in Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Business (2018-2023)
11.3.5 University of Houston Recent Development
11.4 University of Tokyo
11.4.1 University of Tokyo Company Detail
11.4.2 University of Tokyo Business Overview
11.4.3 University of Tokyo Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Introduction
11.4.4 University of Tokyo Revenue in Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Business (2018-2023)
11.4.5 University of Tokyo Recent Development
11.5 Los Alamos National Laboratory
11.5.1 Los Alamos National Laboratory Company Detail
11.5.2 Los Alamos National Laboratory Business Overview
11.5.3 Los Alamos National Laboratory Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Introduction
11.5.4 Los Alamos National Laboratory Revenue in Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Business (2018-2023)
11.5.5 Los Alamos National Laboratory Recent Development
11.6 University of Cambridge
11.6.1 University of Cambridge Company Detail
11.6.2 University of Cambridge Business Overview
11.6.3 University of Cambridge Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Introduction
11.6.4 University of Cambridge Revenue in Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Business (2018-2023)
11.6.5 University of Cambridge Recent Development
11.7 University of Maryland
11.7.1 University of Maryland Company Detail
11.7.2 University of Maryland Business Overview
11.7.3 University of Maryland Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Introduction
11.7.4 University of Maryland Revenue in Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Business (2018-2023)
11.7.5 University of Maryland Recent Development
11.8 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
11.8.1 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Company Detail
11.8.2 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Business Overview
11.8.3 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Introduction
11.8.4 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Revenue in Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Business (2018-2023)
11.8.5 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Recent Development
11.9 University of Oslo
11.9.1 University of Oslo Company Detail
11.9.2 University of Oslo Business Overview
11.9.3 University of Oslo Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Introduction
11.9.4 University of Oslo Revenue in Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Business (2018-2023)
11.9.5 University of Oslo Recent Development
11.10 University of Geneva
11.10.1 University of Geneva Company Detail
11.10.2 University of Geneva Business Overview
11.10.3 University of Geneva Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Introduction
11.10.4 University of Geneva Revenue in Normal Temperature Superconductor Technology Business (2018-2023)
11.10.5 University of Geneva Recent Development
12 Analyst's Viewpoints/Conclusions
13 Appendix
13.1 Research Methodology
13.1.1 Methodology/Research Approach
13.1.2 Data Source
13.2 Disclaimer
13.3 Author Details
Team Ranga Dias, University of Rochester, New York
IBM
University of Houston
University of Tokyo
Los Alamos National Laboratory
University of Cambridge
University of Maryland
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
University of Oslo
University of Geneva
Ìý
Ìý
*If Applicable.
